Flutter › State Management with setState

At what specific point does using setState genuinely become sufficient for a genuinely simple Flutter app, and when does a genuinely more particular dedicated external state management solution actually genuinely become worth adopting instead?

Beginner

Answer

setState is genuinely perfectly sufficient and quite appropriate for managing state that genuinely only matters to just one single specific widget, such as whether a particular expandable section is currently open or closed, or the current text within one single specific text field, and a genuinely more dedicated external state management solution such as Provider or Riverpod generally becomes worth adopting once you genuinely need to properly share a given piece of state across several genuinely separate different widgets that are not directly related to one another through a simple parent child relationship, since setState alone would otherwise require you to manually and quite awkwardly pass that same shared data down through several genuinely unrelated intermediate widget constructors.
// setState is genuinely fine for local, widget-specific state
bool _isExpanded = false;
Real-world example A developer building a simple accordion style expandable section widget properly uses setState alone, since that particular widget's own expanded or collapsed state genuinely only ever matters to that one single specific widget itself and never actually genuinely needs to be shared anywhere else.

Common follow-ups: What genuinely specific symptoms indicate that a given app has genuinely outgrown relying purely on setState alone?;Can setState and a genuinely more dedicated external state management solution reasonably be used together within exactly the same single given app?