How should a large team properly organize their overall Riverpod provider architecture, deciding exactly how granular each individual given provider should genuinely be and how they should genuinely be organized across an entire large codebase?

A large team adopting Riverpod typically benefits from establishing genuinely clear conventions around provider granularity, generally preferring several genuinely smaller, more narrowly focused individual providers over one single genuinely large monolithic provider holding an excessive amount of unrelated combined state together, since smaller providers genuinely rebuild considerably more narrowly and precisely and are generally considerably easier to properly test in complete isolation, and organizing these providers consistently by individual feature, typically colocated directly alongside that particular feature's own other related files within a modular feature based folder structure, helps meaningfully keep a genuinely large Riverpod based codebase properly organized and considerably easier to navigate confidently over time.

// Smaller, focused providers rather than one large monolithic combined provider
final userNameProvider = Provider((ref) => ref.watch(userProvider).name);
final userEmailProvider = Provider((ref) => ref.watch(userProvider).email);